The Chicago Journal

Steve Witowski Didn’t Ask to Be a Hero and That’s Precisely What Makes This Book So Memorable

By: KC Cronin

Barry Maher opens this novel with a Harvard professor riffing on Moby-Dick and The Great Gatsby in the late sixties, tossing off the idea of a modern version called The Great Dick, and from that first scene you understand you’re in the hands of a writer who is doing something more layered and more intentionally literary than the horror-comedy packaging might initially suggest. The Great Dick is a genuinely ambitious book wearing the clothing of a wild genre romp, and the combination is more satisfying than either element would be on its own.

What reading it actually feels like is being pulled along by someone who is a gifted and slightly unhinged storyteller, someone who leans in at the important moments and keeps you slightly uncertain about where the floor is. The novel produces a specific kind of pleasurable unease, the feeling of enjoying yourself more than you think you probably should be, given the things happening on the page. Steve Witowski is messy and morally compromised and completely recognizable in his tendency to rationalize everything uncomfortable that crosses his path, and Maher writes him with an affection that stops just short of excusing him. That balance is what keeps you invested rather than irritated.

The book’s central tension, between Steve’s adamant refusal to believe in anything supernatural and the increasingly undeniable evidence that something very wrong is happening in and around Victoria’s crumbling church, works as both a plot engine and a character study. His skepticism isn’t stupidity. It’s a coping mechanism that has served him through a life full of situations he’d rather not have fully processed, and watching that mechanism fail in real time is where the book gets genuinely interesting beneath the surface entertainment. The themes of belief, denial, accountability, and the cost of staying willfully blind to what’s right in front of you are ones that don’t require a demon to feel relevant. They’re the architecture of how a lot of people move through their actual lives.

Maher’s prose style is distinctive in a way that takes a chapter or two to fully calibrate to and then becomes one of the main pleasures of the reading experience. He has a deadpan rhythm that makes the darkly funny moments land without telegraphing them, and the 1982 California setting is evoked with a specificity that gives the whole novel a grimy, tactile atmosphere. The sex and violence feel organic to the story rather than ornamental, which is not always the case in this genre, and the quieter moments of exhausted tenderness between characters give the book an emotional range that earns its more extreme sequences.

This is a novel born from brain surgery and driven by the particular clarity that sometimes comes from surviving something that could have gone very differently. That origin isn’t just a compelling anecdote. It’s the source of the book’s best quality, its refusal to be cautious, its willingness to go all the way into the dark and find something worth laughing at there. Barry Maher has written something genuinely original and it deserves to find the readers who will recognize it for what it is.

If you’ve ever wanted a horror novel that makes you laugh out loud and then immediately feel unsettled about the fact that you just laughed, The Great Dick: And the Dysfunctional Demon is waiting for you on Amazon. Pick it up, clear your evening, and prepare to meet Steve Witowski. He’s a mess. You’re going to love him.

Chicago Opens HomeGrown Grants Offering Up to $70,000 Toward a First Home

Chicago began accepting applications on June 8 for the HomeGrown Purchase Assistance Program, a $21 million initiative that offers eligible buyers up to $70,000 toward down payments and closing costs. The Department of Housing program, announced by Mayor Brandon Johnson on June 1, targets the obstacle that keeps many otherwise mortgage-ready households out of the market: the upfront cash a purchase demands.

The premise behind the program is that affordability is often less about the monthly payment than the initial hurdle. Rising rents and closing costs have left working families able to carry a mortgage but unable to assemble the lump sum a purchase requires. HomeGrown provides direct grant assistance rather than a loan, money that does not have to be repaid so long as the buyer meets the program’s terms, aimed squarely at that gap.

The need is visible in the numbers. The median sale price for a Chicago home in April was $388,918, up more than 5 percent year over year, according to Redfin data cited in local coverage. Against prices climbing at that pace, the savings required for a conventional down payment have moved faster than many households can keep up.

How the Grants Work

The assistance is structured to flex by income and geography. Grant amounts are tiered by household income relative to the area median income and by the property’s location, which the city sorts into two zones. Buyers purchasing in Zone A, covering neighborhoods that have seen significant increases in home sale prices, can qualify for up to $70,000, while those in Zone B can receive as much as $50,000, with award sizes stepping down as incomes rise. In all cases, the grant cannot exceed 25 percent of the purchase price before other assistance is applied.

Eligibility carries several conditions. Buyers must meet income and mortgage requirements, complete homebuyer education counseling, and contribute at least 1 percent of the purchase price from their own funds. The grants apply to one- and two-unit homes that buyers occupy as their primary residence, with investment and non-owner-occupied properties excluded. A recapture agreement requires buyers to remain in the home for at least five years, reinforcing the program’s stated goal of helping people put down roots rather than flip properties.

Funding is finite and first-come, first-served. The $21 million pool is expected to assist roughly 300 to 400 households, and the city says the program will stay open until the money is exhausted. Applications are handled by two community development financial institutions, Neighborhood Lending Services and TRP Lending, an affiliate of The Resurrection Project, which manage eligibility reviews and disbursement. Prospective buyers can verify a property’s zone through a lookup tool on the city’s HomeGrown page.

Where It Fits Among Existing Programs

HomeGrown joins a roster of Chicago homebuyer supports, but city officials describe it as distinct in scope. The Chicago Housing Authority’s down-payment program offers up to $20,000 and is limited to public housing residents and voucher holders, while the TaxSmart program provides first-time buyers a mortgage-interest tax credit rather than cash at closing. Destiny Durham, project manager of homebuyer programs at the Department of Housing, said the department made HomeGrown citywide specifically to narrow affordability gaps between neighborhoods, noting that many families could be priced out despite being financially capable.

The larger grant ceiling and the citywide footprint are the program’s defining features. By extending assistance across all neighborhoods rather than concentrating it in designated tracts, the city is attempting to reach buyers in higher-cost areas who have largely fallen outside earlier, more geographically limited efforts.

What It Signals About the City’s Strategy

HomeGrown draws from Johnson’s $1.25 billion Housing and Economic Development Bond, situating it within a broader administration bet that public capital can expand homeownership and, with it, household wealth. The framing is deliberate: officials cast homeownership as a path to building equity and more predictable long-term housing costs, particularly for families in communities that have seen decades of disinvestment.

The program’s limits are worth keeping in view. A fund sized to help a few hundred households makes a measurable difference for those buyers but a modest dent in a market where affordability pressure is broad and persistent. One-time grant initiatives also raise the question of what follows once the money is spent, and whether demand will far outstrip the available pool, as the first-come structure suggests it might.

For now, the launch gives a concrete tool to Chicagoans who have watched ownership drift out of reach. Whether HomeGrown becomes a durable fixture of the city’s housing strategy or a one-time intervention will depend on how quickly the funds move and what the administration chooses to do once they are gone.