The Chicago Journal

Northwestern Scientists Identify Fructose “Shield” In Glioblastoma, Opening New Path For Brain Cancer Treatment

Scientists at Northwestern Medicine have discovered a major breakthrough in brain cancer research by identifying how glioblastoma tumors use fructose to “hide” from the human immune system. The study, published on March 17, 2026, in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, reveals that specialized immune cells within these aggressive tumors hijack sugar metabolism to stop the body from fighting the cancer. By blocking the specific transporter that allows cells to use this sugar, researchers successfully stopped tumor growth in mouse models, providing a promising new target for drug development to treat one of the most deadly forms of brain cancer.

Understanding the Glioblastoma Challenge

Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive type of primary brain tumor in adults. For decades, it has remained one of the most difficult cancers to treat because it is highly resistant to traditional therapies like chemotherapy and radiation. One of the biggest obstacles is the “immunosuppressive” nature of the tumor environment. Essentially, the tumor creates a “dead zone” where the body’s immune cells, which should be attacking the cancer, are instead forced to shut down.

The team at Northwestern, led by Jason Miska, an assistant professor of neurological surgery, focused on the metabolic “fuel” these tumors use. While many cancers are known to consume glucose (common blood sugar), this study highlights a much more specific and dangerous process involving fructose.

The Role of Fructose in Tumor Survival

The research found that the brain tumor environment is surprisingly rich in fructose. When immune cells called myeloid cells enter the tumor to fight it, they undergo a metabolic shift. Instead of using their normal energy sources, they begin to consume the fructose present in the tumor.

This shift causes the immune cells to stop acting as “soldiers” and start acting as “protectors” for the cancer. They begin to suppress other immune cells, like T-cells, which are the primary tools the body uses to kill cancer cells. By “feeding” these immune cells fructose, the glioblastoma effectively creates a shield that prevents the immune system from ever seeing the threat.

Significant Findings from Mouse Models

The most striking part of the Northwestern study involved testing how these tumors behave when their access to fructose is cut off. The researchers focused on a protein called GLUT5, which acts as the “doorway” or transporter that allows cells to take in fructose.

By using genetic tools to remove the GLUT5 transporter in several mouse models, the team observed a dramatic shift in the results. Without the ability to process fructose, the specialized immune cells did not turn into protectors for the cancer. Instead, the immune system remained active and aggressive toward the tumor.

“Across several mouse models, when we removed the fructose transporter, the tumors simply didn’t grow,” said senior author Jason Miska. This finding is significant because it suggests that the tumor cannot simply switch to another fuel source to maintain its immune shield. The dependence on fructose appears to be a critical weakness.

Clinical Potential and the Future of Treatment

This discovery is being hailed as a potential game-changer for precision medicine in Chicago and beyond. Because the GLUT5 transporter is not highly active in healthy brain tissue, a drug designed to block it could potentially target the tumor environment without causing major side effects in the rest of the brain.

Research ComponentKey Detail
Publication DateMarch 17, 2026
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
Primary TargetGLUT5 (Fructose Transporter)
Tumor TypeGlioblastoma (Grade IV Brain Cancer)
Key ResultZero tumor growth in GLUT5-deficient models

Medical experts not involved in the study have expressed cautious optimism. “What makes this Northwestern research so compelling is that it doesn’t just target the cancer cells themselves; it targets the environment that allows them to thrive,” noted Dr. Elena Rossi, an oncologist specializing in brain malignancies. “If we can prevent the immune system from being compromised, we give existing therapies a much better chance of working.”

The Next Steps for Northwestern Medicine

The transition from mouse models to human clinical trials is the next major hurdle. The research team is now looking toward developing “small molecule” inhibitors—drugs that can be taken orally or through IV—that can cross the blood-brain barrier and block the GLUT5 transporter in human patients.

Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine is already a leader in neuro-oncology, and this breakthrough further cements Chicago’s status as a global hub for cancer research. The university often collaborates with local biotech firms to speed up the development of these new drugs.

For patients and families currently dealing with a glioblastoma diagnosis, this research provides a rare sense of hope. While a cure is not yet here, identifying the “fructose shield” gives scientists a clear roadmap for a new generation of treatments. The study proves that by understanding the “diet” of a tumor, we can find new ways to starve it of its power and let the body’s natural defenses finish the job.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. The research described is based on preclinical findings in mouse models and has not yet been validated in human clinical trials. Patients should consult qualified healthcare professionals regarding any medical condition or treatment decisions.

Chicago Confronts Air Quality Challenges Inside and Out

Chicago’s air quality has become an increasingly visible concern for residents and public officials. The city has long faced environmental challenges tied to transportation corridors, industrial activity, and regional pollution patterns. Recent research and public health data suggest the issue deserves renewed attention, particularly in neighborhoods already facing environmental burdens.

Northwestern University researchers recently identified Chicago’s West Side as an air pollution hotspot, where residents face elevated exposure to fine particulate matter and other pollutants linked to traffic and industrial activity. The findings illustrate how air quality challenges can vary dramatically within a single city, often affecting certain neighborhoods more than others.

At times, the issue becomes visible across the entire region. The American Lung Association found that Chicago’s air ranked among the most polluted in the country during certain periods in 2024, reflecting a troubling reversal in national progress on pollution levels. Smoke from Canadian wildfires has periodically pushed pollution levels into unhealthy ranges across the region, triggering warnings for vulnerable populations.

These environmental pressures affect both outdoor and indoor environments. While pollution levels may fluctuate outside, most people spend the majority of their time indoors. As a result, questions about air quality increasingly extend beyond the streets and into the buildings where Chicagoans work, learn, and gather.

Schools and Public Buildings in the Spotlight

Public buildings are often the first places where concerns about air quality surface. Schools and municipal buildings host large numbers of people each day and frequently operate in aging facilities that rely on older heating and ventilation systems.

Chicago Public Schools, for example, manages hundreds of buildings across the city, many constructed decades ago. Similar conditions exist in community centers and government offices. Maintaining consistent indoor air quality in these spaces requires careful management of ventilation systems, filtration equipment, and energy use.

At the same time, public awareness of indoor air quality has increased in recent years. According to the 2025 GPS Air Indoor Air Quality Perception Report two-thirds of Americans said they are more cautious about indoor air than they were before the pandemic, while nearly 70% reported that pollution and environmental events have made them more mindful of air quality overall.

The survey also revealed that a majority of people trust the air in their homes more than in shared environments such as schools, offices, or stores. Only a small percentage believe public buildings have better air systems than their homes.

For schools and other public facilities, that dynamic increases the pressure to demonstrate that buildings are being properly maintained and ventilated.

New Ways to See and Manage Chicago’s Air

As concerns about air quality grow in Chicago, new tools are emerging to help both residents and building operators better understand and manage the air around them. The Chicago Department of Public Health recently launched Open Air Chicago, an online map that allows residents to check neighborhood-level air conditions using a network of sensors that measure pollutants such as particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide. 

Platforms like Open Air Chicago reflect a broader emphasis on transparency, giving residents clearer insight into environmental conditions that were once monitored mostly behind the scenes. 

At the same time, building operators are adopting technologies that help manage air quality inside schools, offices, and other public facilities. Indoor monitoring systems can track indicators such as particulate matter and airflow performance, allowing facility managers to identify issues and adjust ventilation when conditions change. Solutions such as smartIAQ GridSet combine sensors and building controls to help facilities monitor indoor air and optimize HVAC performance while managing energy use. 

These types of tools demonstrate how cities and building managers are responding to rising expectations around air quality by making information more visible and giving operators better ways to maintain healthy indoor environments.

A Continuing Conversation

Air quality concerns in Chicago are unlikely to disappear. Urban growth and regional environmental factors will continue to influence pollution levels for years to come.

What is changing is how the city and its residents respond. New research, expanded monitoring networks, and improved building technologies reflect a desire to confront the issue more directly.

Public tools like Open Air Chicago empower residents to see what is happening in their neighborhoods. Building technologies that track indoor air quality help facility managers respond more quickly when conditions change.

Together, these efforts point toward a future where air quality is no longer treated as an invisible issue. Instead, it becomes something cities and buildings monitor openly and address proactively.

Circle and Its Expanding Role Across Education, Wellness, and Business Communities in the Global Creator Economy

Digital tools for groups and learning have become a common feature in schools, creator economies, and organizations. Since 2020, collaboration software and membership site platforms have transitioned from being nice-to-have features to necessary infrastructure. This came about because of the remote work experience, the growth of online learning, and the explosion of businesses led by creators. By 2024, many teams began to expect a platform that could do all things like discussions, events, payments, and learning in one place. This pressure forced platforms to cater to a broad range of industries simultaneously.

At the same time, creators and organizations began to seek alternatives to open social platforms. Algorithms, ad-based platforms, and comment systems often failed to deliver on long-term engagement. As a result, closed or semi-closed community platforms began to gain popularity in the education, wellness, and professional development sectors. These platforms provided more control over membership, organization, and moderation. Observers in the creator economy have pointed out that this trend is indicative of a need for reliable digital spaces that facilitate long-term engagement rather than mere short-term reach.

Within this environment, Circle, founded in 2019 by Sid Yadav, Rudy Santino, and Andrew Guttormson, has built a customer base that includes universities, individual creators, and businesses. Public company materials and product case studies show that its software is used to host discussions, courses, live events, and paid memberships. By the end of 2025, the platform reported supporting more than 18,000 communities and over 12 million members worldwide. These figures suggest that usage extends beyond a single sector or audience type.

In education, Circle has been used by academic and training programs that require structured interaction and long-term engagement. Harvard University is cited as an example of how institutions are relying on community platforms to support groups of students, alumni, and professionals learning together. In such arrangements, online communities are not a replacement for coursework but rather an addition to it, providing people with a space to connect, share information, and keep the conversation going. This is part of a larger trend in higher education, as online communities are increasingly being used to stay in touch after the end of a class.

Wellness and mental health services are another area where community-based services are on the rise. Public figures such as Dr. Becky Kennedy, who is an expert in parenting education, have started using private community platforms to host organized programs and group discussions. Such platforms allow hosts to address sensitive issues while maintaining the privacy of members.

In the field of business and personal development, public figures such as Mel Robbins and Jay Shetty have huge online communities that they have built through books, podcasts, and speaking events. The type of platform that hosts communities allows these content creators to move beyond one-time live streaming and provide subscription-based access for engagement. This model enables group challenges, workshops, and networking, which can be difficult to manage on more traditional social media platforms. For content creators, these platforms are both where content is delivered and where they manage relationships with their customers.

From a technology perspective, serving a broad audience requires flexible infrastructure. Communities for education will emphasize tools for courses and discussion, while wellness communities will emphasize moderation and privacy. Business communities will require payment functionality, event hosting, and integration with marketing tools. The product evolution of Circle from 2021 to 2025 introduced courses, mobile apps, payments, automation, and AI-driven workflows. The aim was to provide a platform that addressed multiple needs in one place.

The company’s growth metrics indicate a steady interest in these areas. The 2025 Year in Review reported more than 202 million likes, 33 million comments, and nearly a million events hosted in that year alone. While these metrics do not provide insight into the success of specific communities, they do indicate the level of engagement that is taking place on the platform. High engagement also suggests the need for strong moderation and organizational tools.

Institutional partnerships and customer networks are essential for platform visibility. When institutions and famous content creators choose to use specific tools, this behavior can influence market outcomes. However, it does not mean that these platforms have entered into exclusive contracts or endorsements. In most cases, platforms such as Circle are more like infrastructure companies than branded partners. They are used in much the same way as learning management systems or video conferencing platforms, which are used across industries without becoming a part of the core brand identity of the organizations they serve.

From a business perspective, having multiple industries represented in the spread of activity helps to mitigate dependence on a particular market. Each of the education, wellness, and professional communities responds in its own unique way to market changes and platform trends. By having a broad audience, you can mitigate fluctuations in revenue and help direct the order in which your development efforts should take place. Leadership at Circle has publicly stated a commitment to creating solutions that can be used across multiple community structures rather than focusing solely on one kind of community (e.g., public figures). This fits well within the overall SaaS trend of focusing on flexibility and modularity.

However, the presence of a variety of users brings many challenges to the development process. The types of solutions created for public figures might not work for smaller nonprofit organizations or academic circles. Platform developers have to balance competing demands from users of different kinds while still ensuring that the system is stable. Researchers have heard far too many stories about how community software requires consideration when it comes time to make changes to moderation (or access control), as any change made could significantly affect trust and/or participation levels.

By late 2025, Circle had carved out a niche for itself as one of several platforms available in the space where education, wellness, and business led by creators meet. Its size and diversity of users indicate that it has become a part of the infrastructure of these industries. Whether or not this continues will depend on a variety of factors, including competition, regulation, and the evolving nature of online interaction. At least for now, it seems to be in the business of providing solutions rather than shaping content or outcomes within communities.

As online communities continue to supplement offline ones, the demand for reliable community platforms is likely to remain strong. The fact that universities, wellness instructors, and business creators all use the same underlying technology points to a set of needs that are shared across industries. Circle, founded in 2019 by Sid Yadav, Rudy Santino, and Andrew Guttormson, operates in this intersection, providing systems that facilitate long-term group interaction for a variety of professional and personal purposes.