The Chicago Journal

Utah approves a bill for social media control for kids

Utah The world has been moving toward a new era of technology and social media for more than a decade.

Many users started using the platforms as teenagers and grew up with them, and their children now want to join in on the fun.

Yet, there has been a heated controversy about whether they should even be permitted on the platforms in the first place.

Utah’s governor signed a contentious bill to safeguard children online on Thursday.

The news

Utah’s governor approved legislation requiring minors to obtain parental consent before opening social media accounts on a variety of sites.

The bill is widely regarded as the most extreme action taken by state or federal politicians to protect children online.

The Utah Social Media Regulation Act includes the following regulations:

  • Social media platforms must conduct age verification for Utah residents
  • Band ads for minors
  • Impose an online curfew
  • Restrict sites between 10:30 pm to 6:30 am for those under 18
  • Parents must be able to access their teens’ accounts

The legislation

Republican Senator Michael McKell presented the legislation, which was later signed into law by Republican Governor Spencer Cox.

It will become effective on March 1, 2024.

McKell talked on how the rise of social media has increased anxiety, sadness, and suicide thoughts among Utah and nationwide children.

“When it comes down to it, [the bill] is about protecting our children,” he said.

“As a lawmaker and parent, I believe this bill is the best path forward to prevent our children from succumbing to the negative and sometimes life-threatening effects of social media.”

The legislation is also the result of years of campaigning by American politicians for protections to protect children and teens online.

Fears about young users falling into harmful rabbit holes have persisted, leading to a new type of abuse and harassment.

Additionally, social media is said to have aggravated what is regarded as a teen mental health crisis in the United States.

As a result, no federal law has been enacted.

The states and proposals

Utah is the first state to pass laws emphasizing children’s internet safety.

They are not, however, the only ones who have designed such a plan.

Legislators in Connecticut and Ohio, for example, are attempting to introduce laws requiring social networking firms to obtain parental consent before allowing users under the age of 16 to join.

“We can assume more methods like the Utah bill could find their way into other states’ plans, especially if actions are not taken at the federal level,” said ABI Research analyst Michael Inouye.

“Eventually, if enough states implement similar or related legislation, we could see a more concerted effort at the federal level to codify these (likely) disparate state laws under a US-wide policy.”

Read also: Chicago mayoral race debate was heated


Experts and Big Tech companies have long lobbied the US government to enact legislation to protect younger social media users.

Even before the bill was passed, many people voiced worries about its implications.

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Utah’s limitations are harmful to user privacy.

According to the organization, the law would also make user data less safe, internet access less private, and infringe on young users’ basic rights.

“Social media provides a lifeline for many young people, in addition to community, education, and conversation,” said EFF director of activism Jason Kelley.

“They use it in part because it can be private.”

“The law, which would limit social media access and require parental consent and monitoring for minors, will incalculably harm the ability of young people to protect their privacy and deter them from exercising their rights.”

Lucy Ivey, a TikTok influencer and Utah Valley University student, agreed with the thoughts of the group.

She argued that the change will provide difficulties for her LGBT colleagues.

“My worry with this bill is that it will take away privacy from teenagers, and a lot of kids don’t have good relationships with their parents or don’t have a reliable guardian that would be needed to get access to social media,” said Ivey.

“I think about my LGBTQ friends; some who have a hard time with their parents because of their sexuality or identity, and they could be losing an important place where they can be themselves, and be seen and heard.”

Ivey created Our Era when she was 15 years old, later expanding her production on TikTok, where she voiced worry about the bill’s ramifications for content creators like herself.

“With a new law like this, they may now be intimidated and discouraged by the legal hoops required to use social media out of fear of authority or their parents, or fear of losing their privacy at a time when teens are figuring out who they are.”

Meta, Facebook’s parent corporation, stated that it shares the same aims as parents and politicians.

Yet, by providing easily accessible platforms, the company encourages young people to have a fun and safe online experience.

Antigone Davis, Meta’s worldwide head of safety, stated that the firm will continue to collaborate with experts, governments, and parents to address the challenges.

Even though the Utah legislative procedures are problematic, Inouye believes that the early efforts to fix the issues are limited.

Meta threatens to remove news content on FB

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, threatened to remove news content from its platforms on Monday.

The threat came after reports emerged that US lawmakers are adding a controversial pro-media legislation to the annual Defense Licensing Act.

Meta’s warning highlights the danger the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA) poses to its business model.

The bill

Senator Amy Klobuchar introduced the legislation with support from more than a dozen lawmakers from the two political parties.

It would create a four-year exemption under US antitrust laws and allow news organizations to jointly negotiate with social media platforms for a greater share of ad revenue in exchange for news content.

Additionally, the legislation is one of many tech-focused antitrust laws waiting on Capitol Hill.

Read also: Meta set for change with workforce layoff


Meta spokesman Andy Stone wrote a statement saying:

“If Congress passes an ill-considered journalism bill as part of national security legislation,” he started.

“We will be forced to consider removing news from our platform altogether rather than submit to government-mandated negotiations that unfairly disregard any value we provide to news outlets through increased traffic and subscriptions.”

Previous actions

Meta has already demonstrated that it intends to follow through with its threats.

A similar legislation was proposed and passed in Australia last year.

As a result, Meta has temporarily removed the ability for users to view and share post links on its platforms.

However, the social media giant changed course when Australia passed the law.

Read also: Meta to make changes after stocks fall 17%

The tech industry

Digital rights organization Fight for the Future has addressed the reports, saying multiple sources said efforts to include the JCPA in the annual defense bill were successful.

Additionally, the National Defense Authorization Act is included in the language of the JCPA.

Meanwhile, the tech industry is fiercely opposing the JCPA.

Furthermore, the bill has been criticized by more than two dozen civil society groups, often clashing with Big Tech on policy issues.

The groups wrote a letter to congressional leaders on Monday saying the JCPA could exacerbate disinformation and disinformation.

The law could allow news sites to sue tech platforms for restricting the publication of a story and intimidate them into moderating offensive or misleading content.

Additionally, the letter says the JCPA may favor large media companies over smaller, local and independent outlets, which have been hurt by falling digital advertising revenue.

The groups that signed the letter include:

  • The American Civil Liberties Union
  • The Electronic Frontier Foundation
  • The Wikimedia Foundation
  • Public Knowledge


Meta threatens to remove news content over US journalism bargaining bill