The Chicago Journal

Domestic Adoption: Potential Risks, Hurdles, and Rewards

Domestic adoption can be a beautiful way to grow your family, but it is not without its own set of unique challenges. Before starting down the adoption path, it’s important to understand the potential risks and hurdles associated with domestic adoption.

One of the most common issues with domestic adoption is that birthparents may decide at the last minute to keep their child. This can be devastating for hopeful adoptive parents, who are often left with little support during the adoption process and must watch as their adoption dreams crumble away. Because of this, it’s incredibly important for adoption agencies to ensure that all parties involved in the adoption process have realistic expectations and are fully informed about what adoption entails.

Another common problem with domestic adoption is that adoption laws vary from state to state, making the adoption process complicated to navigate. This can lead to problems like delays or complications in the adoption process, as well as legal issues down the line with birth parents who may have certain rights in one state but not another. Additionally, adoption costs can be high, as adoption fees and travel expenses add up quickly.

Finally, adoption fraud is a real concern with domestic adoption. Prospective adoptive parents should always do their research and work with an agency they trust to protect themselves from adoption scams. By understanding the risks associated with domestic adoption, you can help ensure your adoption journey is a successful one.

However, even through all those obstacles, adoption can be an incredibly rewarding experience. Take the story of Mike King and his wife, Gaby. They went through the painstaking adoption process, and while it was filled with challenges, difficulties, and sometimes tremendous heartbreak, the rewards were beyond magnificent. In his compelling new book, Dad Spelled Backward: A Journey Through the Maze of Love, Marriage, and Adoption, Mike King writes extensively on his journey through domestic adoption.

This very real and transparent story by a husband and parent is perceptive, sincere, equally full of hilarious and tender moments, and ultimately a monument to love that knows no bounds. Mike narrates the tale of how, after learning that they were unable to have a child, he reluctantly agreed to proceed to the next stage of potential parenthood—adoption—in order to make his wife happy.

Can having too much sex kill you? In his book, Dad Spelled Backward: A Journey Through the Maze of Love, Marriage, and Adoption, well-known New York pediatric dentist Dr. Michael King poses this query. Mike had never given marriage and fatherhood any attention, although his work focuses on children and their care. However, when he met Gabriella, his beautiful (and much younger) French wife, in his fifties, all of that changed. Together, they decide to attempt to have children. They put all their efforts into getting pregnant, and Mike hilariously posits the question of whether too much intercourse can be a cause of death.

Unfortunately, domestic adoption is frequently a drawn-out, expensive procedure that sends couples on a roller coaster of hope and misery. Mike describes how he and Gabriella were put in touch with pregnant women one after another until they were ultimately granted a baby, only to be forced to give the child back when the birth mother had a change of heart. They were left feeling so emotionally spent that they had to determine if having children was worth the cost or if they should give up.

Other couples would have split up due to such tragedy, but Gabriella and Mike simply became closer. Their love for one another only strengthened, and they eventually became parents. Mike says, “I hope this book motivates individuals who want to have children or are thinking about having children.” We all have challenges in life, but if love wins, the battle is worthwhile.

This beautiful tale of one man’s journey into love, a successful marriage, and fatherhood will make you smile and cry along with Gaby and Mike.

Dr. Mike King is intriguing. He is a comedian and a pediatric dentist, and he has established his practice in a not-so-usual way by using humor and magic tricks to help kids relax. He is the author of the children’s novels Enamel the Camel and Flossopher and the Brushing Trees. Mike’s father owned Sid King’s Crazy Horse Bar in Denver, Colorado, so entertainment runs in the family. It was one of the most well-known burlesque venues West of the Mississippi in the 1970s and ’80s, so it was only a matter of time before Mike started entertaining adults. He is referred to as “The Fifth Dentist” in the comedy club scene because “four out of five dentists recommend sugarless gum,” as the saying goes. Mike frequently performs at Broadway Comedy Club, Gotham Comedy Club, and New York Comedy Club. He has created a one-man act in addition to the musical The Lap Dance Kid, which is now in development. Mike’s biggest pastime that he relishes the most is spending time with his wife and daughter. They are currently living in New York City.

Argentina wins World Cup 2022, Messi completes football

Image source: The New York Times

Argentina: The 2022 World Cup ended following an exciting six-goal match between Argentina and France, which the former won on penalties.

Lionel Messi has conquered football with the coveted Jules Rimet trophy, much to the delight of the millions who backed the Argentine.

The debate of who is the best player in the world has finally been determined.


Argentina reached the championship game after defeating several strong underdog opponents.

The teams they defeated are as follows:

  • Mexico
  • Australia
  • The Netherlands

While this was going on, France accomplished the seemingly unachievable and broke the World Cup winners’ curse by advancing past the group stage, the round of 16, the quarterfinals, and the semifinals.

The World Cup 2022 championship game featured back-and-forth play between the two teams.

Argentina took the lead by scoring two goals before the half.

In the second half, France rallied to level the match.

The Golden Boy, Kylian Mbappe, managed a double and was the team’s catalyst.

After the game ended 2-2, both teams tried to score the winning goal in extra time.

Argentina persevered and made what they believed to be the winning shot.

On the other hand, Mbappe swiftly grounded them back.

Penalties resulted from the extra time.

Despite the heated atmosphere, Argentina was able to hit every target.

Goalkeeper Emil Martinez of Argentina did what he does best and saved two French shots to help Argentina win the World Cup for the first time in decades.

Starting 11s

For the biggest stage of the tournament, French manager Didier Deschamps chose a solid starting eleven to ensure they would defend their title and make history.

The France starting eleven include:

  • Hugo Lloris
  • Jules Kounde
  • Raphael Varane
  • Dayot Upamecano
  • Theo Hernandez
  • Antoine Griezmann
  • Adrien Rabiot
  • Aurelian Tchouameni
  • Ousmane Dembele
  • Olivier Giroud
  • Kylian Mbappe

Meanwhile, the superb eleven fielded by the Argentinean Lionel Scaloni included the following players:

  • Emil Martinez
  • Nahuel Molina
  • Cristian Romero
  • Nicolas Otamendi
  • Nicolas Tagliafico
  • Rodrigo De Paul
  • Enzo Fernandez
  • Alexis Mac Allister
  • Angel Di Maria
  • Julian Alvarez

The first half

The compact 4-4-2 formation was chosen by Argentina when the starting lineups were announced just before kickoff.

In contrast, Deschamps chose the 4-3-3 lineup France used to win the 2018 World Cup in Russia.

Argentina didn’t wait for the French to surround them; instead, they rushed hard to get a look at a goal early.

France’s Hugo Lloris had a busy first half as the Argentines put pressure on the defense.

Angel Di Maria’s productivity was impressive despite his futile crosses.

In the 21st minute, Di Maria clashed with Ousmane Dembele and collapsed to the ground, earning the game’s first penalty.

When Lionel Messi took the penalty to take the lead, he was successful.

After fifteen minutes, the Argentines stole the ball from the French and launched a counterattack, giving Mac Allister a clear shot at goal.

He used his peripheral vision to find Di Maria on the left flank and made the pass.

The second goal was scored by a Juventus player who went unnoticed.

Just before halftime, Didier Deschamps brought Marcus Thuram and Randal Kolo Muani in for Giroud and Dembele.

The French managed to stay in the game until the whistle.

Read also: The USMNT move forward after beating Iran

The second half

After the opening kickoff, the French attitude changed.

Argentina remained challenging, but whatever pep talk Deschamps gave his squad at the break helped as they had more possession.

Additionally, the French began to defend themselves more vehemently.

Scaloni replaced Angel Di Maria with Marcus Acuna with 35 minutes left to play, resting the best player from the first half.

Edouardo Camavinga and Kingsley Coman were brought to replace Hernandez and Griezmann with new legs.

Eleven minutes before the game’s conclusion, Nicolas Otamendi of Argentina made a bad mistake and fell Randal Kolo Muani to the ground.

The French were given their first chance thanks to Kylian Mbappe’s penalty.

When the young Frenchman scored just a minute later, it was evident that the penalty wasn’t enough.

With a crucial block, Otamendi stopped Mbappe from scoring his hat trick.

The extra time was consumed by the two sides, adding to the overall time.

Extra time

Argentina replaced Molina on the right side of the defense with Gonzalo Montiel.

In the 96th minute of action, Deschamps substituted Youssouf Fofana for Rabiot.

Three minutes later, De Paul made a key block to stop France from adding a third goal.

Leandro Paredes and Lautaro Martinez substituted him and Alvarez after four minutes.

The substitutes motivated the Argentines as they forced the French into the break.

Messi and his side continued to apply pressure as soon as the second overtime period started.

Messi received the ball and scored after a Lloris save in the 108th minute.

Despite Upamecano’s attempt to clear the ball, Argentina led the game 3-2 when the ball crossed the goal line.

After five minutes, Paredes made a risky challenge on Camavinga, resulting in a penalty for France.

Mbappe responded by scoring his third goal of the match to even the score.

In the extra time, Tagliafico was substituted by Paulo Dybala.

The French replaced Jules Kounde at the same time with Axel Disasi.

Muani was one-on-one with the goalie during a French counterattack, but Emil Martinez produced an Iker Casillas-like save to keep the score intact.

A penalty shootout followed the final whistle.

The shootout

As France took the first shot in the shootout, Mbappe scored his fourth goal of the game.

In the interim, Messi offered Argentina hope by doing the same.

Emil Martinez made his customary dive to the right to block Coman’s penalty.

The second goal was scored by Argentina’s Paulo Dybala, who followed in the footsteps of Messi and Martinez.

Tchoumeni made an effort to motivate the French players, but it’s possible that his exhaustion prevented him from scoring.

Argentina scored on Paredes’ third kick, despite Lloris putting a hand on the ball.

Muani defeated Martinez to even the score at 2-3 as compensation for the misses.

Gonzalo Montiel rose up for the final penalty attempt and swung Lloris the wrong way.

Argentina won the world title.

Read also: Qatar World Cup debut ends in loss to Ecuador

Other notes

Argentina ultimately won the World Cup and brought home the gold.

Lionel Messi and Angel Di Maria have achieved their greatest dream.

The debate between Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo has ended since Messi was instrumental in making the long-held ambition come true.


Argentina vs France lineup, starting 11 for World Cup final at Qatar 2022

World Cup final: Argentina vs France score, highlights, result, reaction as shootout gives Messi glory after Mbappe hat-trick

Twitter and Elon Musk sued by former workers

Image source: Tech Crunch

Twitter: A group of former Twitter employees who are suing Elon Musk achieved a preliminary victory on Wednesday.

A judge required the social networking business to notify the fired employees of the legal proceedings.

This ensures that workers are informed before being asked to sign a release of liability clause in a severance agreement.

The lawsuit

After Elon Musk took over the company last month, Twitter let go of thousands of employees.

Following the acquisition, a number of former employees claimed that he had broken his pledge to permit remote work and offer consistent severance money.

The class-action status requested in this case.

Additionally, it alleges that the business did not provide at least one recently laid-off employee enough notice.

California and federal law both need the notice.

Neither Musk nor Twitter did not compensate the worker in lieu of the notice.

The order

On Wednesday, the motion was approved by the judge, Hames Donato.

Twitter’s talks with employees “should not be rendered misleading by omitting material information about a pending lawsuit,” the California district court judge ruled.

The order demonstrates the court’s consideration of the employee’s viewpoint.

Read also: TikTok research finds teens exposed to harmful content

The layoffs

Twitter and Elon Musk sacked thousands of staff beginning in November.

The decision was made in an effort to save money.

Employees began posting that they couldn’t access their work email accounts the evening before the layoffs.

Some people used salute and blue heart emoticons to signify their departure from the organization.

By dawn, a number of Twitter departments announced their exit.

The following departments are among those impacted:

  • Ethical AI
  • Marketing and communication
  • Search
  • Public policy
  • Wellness

Additionally, the curation team, which promotes reliable content on Twitter about subjects like elections, lost a number of its members.

Someone claimed that they had been deleted and remotely logged out of Slack.

Many workers admitted to having access issues hours before Musk fired them.

In addition, they received emails that said nothing about the layoff.

However, several of the fired employees felt relieved.


Elon Musk visited an investor conference early in November, participating in a cordial interview as Twitter employees announced their layoffs.

Musk didn’t say anything in response to the interviewer’s claim that he fired half the staff; he simply nodded.

The Tesla CEO then defended the firings by saying that the business had faced “revenue issues” prior to his acquisition, similar to other social networking sites.

Advertisers were reevaluating their spending as long as recessionary anxieties persisted throughout the year.

The cuts

Before Musk’s takeover, Twitter had a workforce of over 7,500; as a result, 3,700 people were let go.

After incurring substantial debt to cover the $44 billion acquisition, Twitter made adjustments to strengthen its financial situation.

The email informing staff of their status is as follows:

“If your employment is not impacted, you will receive a notification via your Twitter email.”

“If your employment is impacted, you will receive a notification with next steps via your personal email.”

Additionally, Twitter announced that all credential access would be suspended, and the offices would be temporarily closed in order to safeguard the security of its personnel and systems.

Read also: Twitter Blue is $3 more for iPhone users

Other lawsuits

On behalf of former workers, Shannon Liss-Riordan filed the lawsuit against Twitter.

She claimed that the order is a straightforward but essential step that gives workers a chance to understand their rights rather than depriving them of money to which they are legally entitled due to Musk’s coercion.

Liss-Riordan brought four lawsuits on behalf of the former workers, this one being one of them.

Cases involving alleged discrimination based on gender and disability are also present.

Another is on behalf of contractors dismissed from Twitter.

The former employees are currently suing the corporation for alleged violations of the federal and California WARN Acts, which mandate early warning of mass layoffs and unspecified monetary damages.

Engineer Emmanuel Cornet, one of those suspended from Twitter, stated in a news conference last week:

“It seems like the layoffs have been done in a way that’s really clumsy and inhumane and potentially illegal… and this is the aftermath.”


Former employees suing Twitter over layoffs score an early victory

Elon Musk’s Twitter lays off employees across the company

The Office impossible to make today, according to star

Image source: People

The Office (the US version) is a popular comedy series that has had a significant influence on modern pop culture.

Many viewers, past and present, have consistently praised The Office as one of the greatest comedies ever to grace TV.

However, Mindy Kaling, a regular on the show for more than eight seasons, thinks many of her characters would be “canceled” if they did the show today.

The news

Mindy Kaling is best known as Kelly Kapoor, the customer service representative of the Dunder Mifflin Scranton Branch.

The actress has had roles in front of and behind the camera, including writing, executive producing and directing.

Kaling recently appeared on Good Morning America when they raised the topic of a reunion or the possibility of a reboot.

While she had a blast on The Office, the actress admitted she didn’t think it would happen.

“That show is so inappropriate now,” said Kaling.

Read also: Avatar: The Way of Water proves to be better


Mindy Kaling echoed the sentiments of many who understand that times have changed.

She acknowledged that people’s attitudes have changed since The Office first aired in 2005.

“The writers who I’m still in touch with now, we always talk about how so much of that show we probably couldn’t make now,” Kaling elaborated.

“Tastes have changed, and honestly what offends people has changed so much now.”

“I think that actually is one of the reasons the show is popular, because people feel like there’s something kind of fearless about it or taboo that it talks about on the show.”

Other thoughts

The Kelly Kapoor actress was also asked what she thinks a modern take on her character in The Office would do.

“I think she would have quit Dunder Mifflin to become an influencer, and then probably be canceled, almost immediately,” Kaling replied.

“Actually, most of the characters on that show would be canceled by now.”

Read also: Kanye West comments can’t stop his resurgence

Steve Carell

Mindy Kaling wasn’t the only former Dunder Mifflin actor to reject reunion talks.

Steve Carell, who has become synonymous with the eccentric Michael Scott, opted out of reprising the role.

In 2018, Carell spoke to Collider and shared his thoughts on The Office’s popularity.

“The show is way more popular now than when it was on the air,” he said.

“I just can’t see it being the same thing, and I think most folks would want it to be the same thing, but it wouldn’t be.”

“Ultimately, I think it’s maybe best to leave well enough alone and just let it exist as what it was,” added Steve Carrell.

However, The Office alumni still holds the show close to his heart, saying:

“So, no. But I love the show. It was the most exciting time, and all of those people are my friends.”

“We all love it. It was a special thing. It was a special thing before it was a special thing. It was special to us, before other people started feeling that way. But, no.”


Mindy Kaling says The US Office is ‘so inappropriate’ now and most of the characters would be ‘canceled’

Donald Trump slumps in voter standing based on recent poll

Image source: CNN

Although he doesn’t have the same power as before, former president Donald Trump recently announced his bid for the presidency in 2024.

Trump’s support among voters has reportedly dropped to its lowest point in more than seven years, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released on Wednesday.

The poll

Only a tiny 31% of registered voters have a favorable opinion of the former US President, according to a Quinnipiac University survey.

An adverse opinion was held by 59% of poll respondents.

According to the university, Donald Trump’s rating in the study is at its lowest point since he declared his first presidential campaign in July 2015.

Independent voters believed that nothing was improving.

In contrast, only 25% of respondents endorsed Donald Trump, while 62% thought less favorably of him.

The evaluation was his lowest among the group ever since Quinnipiac published the survey in May 2015.

Trump saw a somewhat stronger showing from his fellow Republicans, who gave him 70% favorable and 20% negative votes.

Despite the significant difference, Trump’s approval rating was still at its lowest since March 2016.

One thousand four hundred fifty-six registered voters were questioned between last Thursday and this past Monday for the poll, which had a 2.6 percentage point margin of error.

“Former President Trump’s post-presidential announcement numbers are heading in the wrong direction,” said Tim Malloy, a polling analyst for Quinnipiac University.

“You would have to go back at least six years to find less support for him from Republican, independent, and American voters as a whole.”


A Quinnipiac University survey found that President Joe Biden’s job approval rating rose to its highest point since September 2021, despite being still below average.

The survey showed an improvement from the Quinnipiac poll in November, even though 43% of participants supported and 49% disapproved of Biden’s initiatives.

According to the poll, he had a 36% approval rating for his performance and a 55% disapproval rating.

President Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump in 2020 but hasn’t said whether he plans to run for politics again in 2024.

He did, however, promise to challenge Trump once again.

Despite his assertions, the majority of registered voters polled by Quinnipiac stated they would rather not see Trump or Biden nominated for President in 2024.

Read also: Donald McEachin died from cancer on Monday


The most recent poll, by Quinnipiac, shows that following the midterm elections in November, Trump’s support is either waning or falling.

Donald Trump has recently come under criticism from his fellow Republicans due to the failure of many of the candidates he personally supported in well-known elections.

As a result, the Democrats strengthened their Senate majority during a season many expected to be favorable to the GOP.

A rising power

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has been gaining support as Donald Trump’s standing is eroding.

DeSantis is a rising star in the Republican Party.

He won reelection with ease in November and built a sizable lead over Trump in the early 2024 Republican primary polls.

DeSantis held a double-digit lead over Trump among likely GOP primary voters in a Wall Street Journal poll published on Wednesday (52% to 38%).

The margin of error for the result was six percentage points, plus or minus.

DeSantis didn’t officially announce his candidacy for President, but the polls showed the outcome.

He chose to accept a second four-year term as governor.

The Florida governor was not mentioned as a potential presidential candidate in the Quinnipiac poll, either.

When questioned, a source with ties to Trump cited a recent Morning Consult poll showing Trump as the undisputed front-runner.

He received 49% of the support of potential GOP primary voters, compared to 31% for DeSantis.


So far, only Donald Trump has officially announced his bid for President in 2024.

Unfortunately, he still needs to put more effort into his campaign.

Instead, scandals and setbacks have damaged his presidential campaign.

For example, Trump posted on social media that the Constitution should be abolished to restore power.

He would later apologize for his comments.

Ye, a rapper who fell out of favor after making antisemitic remarks and identifying as a white supremacist, and Trump also had dinner together.

The former President’s first choice for the Georgia Senate, Herschel Walker, was defeated by Senator Raphael Warnock in a runoff vote in December.

In the end, two Trump Organization companies were found guilty of crimes.

This week, a New York jury found Trump’s businesses accountable for a number of infractions, including:

  • Tax fraud
  • Falsifying business records
  • Conspiracy

Trump was found guilty of 17 charges three weeks after announcing his bid for the presidency in 2024.

Trump said he would appeal the decision because he was unhappy with it.

“It is a continuation of the Greatest Political Witch Hunt in the History of our Country,” he wrote in a statement.

“New York City is a hard place to be ‘Trump.'”

Read also: Maxine Waters firm on having Sam Bankman-Fried attend hearing

Other notes

On Wednesday, Donal Trump hinted on social media that he would make a significant announcement on Thursday.

The article includes a video of Trump saying, “America needs a superhero.”

The movie also included a brief animation of a cartoon Trump shooting lasers out of his eyes in front of Trump Tower.


Trump hits 7-year low in new national poll as Biden approval climbs

Trump Organization convicted in New York criminal tax fraud case

Elon Musk sells giant chunk of Tesla shares again

Image source: Inside EVs

Elon Musk is highly known for a number of things, but he is best known for his role as CEO of the renowned electric car firm Tesla.

Just recently, Musk sold more than 22 million shares of Musk’s company for a total of about $3.6 billion.

The details were disclosed in a financial document that was made available to the public on Wednesday night.

According to paperwork submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the transactions happened this week between Monday and Wednesday.


Before taking over the well-known social media network Twitter, Elon Musk had his hands full with Tesla and SpaceX.

On April 29, he tweeted the following to let his fans know about some changes to the electric vehicle manufacturer’s stock:

“No further TSLA sales planned after today.”

According to VerityData, a company that performs financial analysis, Musk has already sold 94,202,321 shares in 2022.

With a share price of $234.46 on average, pre-tax profits came to about $22.93 billion.


Ben Silverman, the research director of VerityData, said:

“Musk’s prior sales going back to November 2021 were expertly timed, so Tesla shareholders need to pay attention to Musk’s actions and not his words – or lack thereof when it comes to his recent selling.”

But Elon Musk persevered in trying to sell off some of his Tesla holdings.

After deciding to pay $44 billion for Twitter, the CEO resolved to sell a significant portion of his shares.

Musk bought Twitter in late October.

Read also: Donald Trump slumps in voter standing based on recent poll


This week, Elon Musk lost his title as the wealthiest person in the world.

The CEO of the luxury goods firm LVMH, Bernard Arnault, has reportedly become the richest person in the world, according to Forbes and Bloomberg.

According to Refinitiv, a source of financial market statistics, he still holds the highest position in Tesla, with a 13.4% holding.

Musk said in November that he had sold 19.5 million Tesla shares for a total of $3.95 billion, only days after taking over Twitter.

The worth of the Tesla CEO has climbed to $174 billion, and Arnault’s wealth has increased to almost $191 billion.


Despite having a well-known brand in the sector, Tesla’s stock performance in 2022 was among the poorest among the most illustrious automakers and IT companies.

Investors worry that Musk’s acquisition of Twitter has taken up the majority of his time.

On Wednesday, the value of Tesla shares, which are traded on the New York Nasdaq index, closed under $500 billion.

The shares last experienced a similar decline in 2020.

Last year, Tesla’s worth was astoundingly above $1 trillion, but it has subsequently decreased in recent months.


Elon Musk completed seizing control of Twitter in October.

His focus and efforts are now solely on the social media platform.

By selling shares of Tesla, Musk was able to raise billions of dollars for the acquisition of Twitter.

The shares decreased as a result of the transactions.

The Twitter agreement was finally finalized after some back and forth between the firm and the CEO of Tesla.

Musk attempted to renege on the agreement during that time before deciding to purchase shares of his own company instead.

Some claim that Tesla’s stock price dropped as a result of the takeover’s distraction.

Investors are also concerned that there may be less demand for the company’s electric automobiles because of the weak economy.

Rising borrowing costs have discouraged customers and other companies from adding more electric vehicles to their lineups.

In addition to the problems already highlighted, Tesla has experienced issues with model autopilot, regulatory inquiries into crashes, and recalls.

Read also: Elon Musk vowed to end child exploitation on Twitter, workforce too thin

Other notes

All of 2022 has seen a decline in Tesla stock.

However, things significantly altered after Elon Musk took over as Twitter’s CEO.

On Wednesday, Tesla stock decreased 2.6% to close at $156.80.

As a result, the company’s market capitalization dropped to $495 billion.

As of Wednesday’s close, Tesla stock has also dropped by 55% year to date.


Elon Musk sells another huge chunk of Tesla shares

Elon Musk sells $3.6 bn of shares in electric car maker Tesla

Avatar: The Way of Water proves to be better

Image source: Tech Radar

Avatar: The Way of Water has had its first screening for critics, while fans still have to wait until later this December.

The sequel to James Cameron’s 2009 film recently received its first wave of reviews.

Cameron’s highly anticipated project was worth the wait as Avatar: The Way of Water received critical acclaim.


The reviews will have fans counting down the days until the theatrical release of Avatar: The Way of Water later this month.

Brandon Davis of Comicbook had nothing but positive words for the film, calling it a “visual feast.”

“Avatar: The Way of Water, being more than 3 hours long, is both fulfilling and indulgent,” wrote Davis.

“It still ends wanting you to know a third is coming.”

“Constantly a visual feast, creative plays with frame rate, and never boring despite. Overall, I liked it.”

Meanwhile, CNN’s Tom Page said the film was vastly better than the original.

“#AvatarTheWayOfWater is “more is more” writ large,” Page tweeted.

“It’s more beautiful, more in awe of Pandora; more vocal in its environmentalism, more damning of humans.”

“It’s an adrenaline shot to 3D filmmaking and an uncompromising doubling down,” he continued. “You’d expect nothing less from Cameron.”

Perri Nemiroff of Collider praised the film and said it was “mind-blowing.”

She also noted that Avatar: The Way of Water has an abiding sense of “serving the character and the building.”

The film

According to Digital Spy, Avatar: The Way of Water picks up the story of Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and Ney’tiri (Zoe Saldana).

In the sequel, the protagonists of the first film start a family.

However, an ancient threat resurfaced on Pandora.

In addition, Jake has an extra conflict with an aggressive war against humans.

The official summary from 20th Century Studio reads:

“Set more than a decade after the events of the first film, Avatar: The Way of Water tells the story of the Sully family, the trouble that follows them, the lengths they go to keep each other safe, the battles they fight to stay alive, and the tragedies they endure.”


Fans of the first Avatar movie have been waiting for the sequel for over a decade, and Cameron recently shared that he’s developing the fourth film.

The sequel to Avatar is set to hit screens in 2026, with part five coming two years later.

James Cameron revealed that he’s already shot parts of Avatar 3 with a direction of ​​where Avatar 6 and 7 should go.

However, he shared that he might not direct the later films, adding that he was ready to hand over the reins to a different director.

The director admitted that the production of the Avatar movies was “all-consuming”, suggesting he might not be able to helm the post-Avatar: The Way of the Water franchise.

“I’ve got some other things I’m developing as well that are exciting,” Cameron shared.

“I think eventually over time – I don’t know if that’s after three or after four – I’ll want to pass the baton to a director that I trust to take over.”

“So I can go do some other stuff that I’m also interested in. Or maybe not. I don’t know.”


The first reviews for Avatar: The Way of Water are in and it looks like James Cameron has done it again

Twitter Blue is $3 more for iPhone users

Image source: 9 to 5 Mac

With an emphasis on the Twitter Blue subscription service, Elon Musk and Twitter have been collaborating to improve the organization’s revenue model.

On Monday, the social media company revealed a new iteration of Twitter Blue.

Last month, Elon Musk halted and postponed the launch, which prompted the upgrade.

Apple service

For web users, Twitter Blue is $8 per month; however, Apple customers are in for a shock since the subscription costs them $11.

There is an additional $3 fee for iOS users who purchase the subscription through the Apple App Store.

The price rise is a result of Elon Musk, the new owner, lately expressing his displeasure with the tech giant’s 30% decline in digital revenue generated by applications.

The cut

Musk began criticizing Apple in November over its decreased Twitter advertising expenditures and its 30% decline in digital sales due to applications.

Tesla’s CEO added that Apple has threatened to remove Twitter from the App Store.

Musk said that he was “going to war” in a later deleted tweet.

Additionally, he suggested he would design his own brand of cellphones from the ground up.

Apple’s reactions

Apple CEO Tim Cook remained silent on Musk’s activities despite numerous provocations.

From a commercial standpoint, Twitter is just another app, and the major tech company doesn’t make much money from its in-app transactions.

Read also: Apple upgrades iCloud security for user safety

Government intervention

Republicans JD Vance, the next senator from Ohio, and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis advised Musk on how to pressure Apple.

DeSantis stated that Congress should investigate Apple’s use of monopoly power if it carried out its threat to fire Twitter.

“You also hear reports Apple is threatening to remove Twitter from the App Store because Elon Musk is actually opening it up for free speech,” said DeSantis.

“And [Musk] is restoring a lot of accounts that were unfairly and illegitimately suspended for putting out accurate information about Covid.”

“If Apple responds to that by nuking them from the app store, I think that would be a huge, huge mistake, and it would be a really raw exercise of monopolistic power.”

On the other hand, JD Vance expressed similar views and said:

“This would be the most raw exercise of monopoly power in a century, and no civilized country should allow it.”

Previous pullouts

The digital behemoths will likely delist Twitter’s app from the App Store if Apple stops collecting platform fees.

Fortnite launched a feature to the iPhone app in 2020 that allowed players to purchase in-game cash from Epic Games directly, lessening Apple’s typical 30% cut of purchases.

Apple took Fortnite off the App Store the same day.

Later, Apple prevailed in a court battle with the other party.

An appeal, however, is still ongoing.

Musk wants to generate more revenue through Twitter subscriptions rather than through adverts.

Twitter is cutting costs while carrying a sizable debt, which reduces Apple’s advertising, a significant challenge.

The subscription

Twitter announced on Saturday that users with verified phone numbers would see a blue checkmark when an account is reviewed and approved.

Subscribers to the Blue service will have access to exclusive features and services, such as tweet editing.

Twitter also promised users the following:

  • Fewer ads on their timeline
  • The option to post longer videos
  • Priority in replies and mentions

The relaunch includes a feature that enables companies to get a gold checkmark.

To avoid impersonations, governments will also have a gray checkmark.

Users can modify their username, display name, and profile photo, according to Twitter.

But if they did, their blue check would be forfeited until their account was again examined.

Elon Musk also disclosed that there would be other functionalities.

Early launch

An early version of Twitter Blue went live in November.

After some users started mimicking companies, the government, and prominent people, Musk promptly shut down the service.

One account tweeted that insulin was free while posing as the pharmaceutical company Eli Lily.

As a result of the false assertion, the company’s stock price fell sharply.

The same issue also plagued the website of the pharmaceutical business AbbVie.

It was once more delayed despite Musk’s assurances that the service would resume on November 29.

Read also: Meta threatens to remove news content on FB


The CEO of Tesla and SpaceX paid $44 billion in October to purchase the social media site.

He has concentrated on Twitter Blue since taking over to replace advertising revenue.

The “huge lever” and the power of the people would be provided by the new verification mechanism, according to Musk.

Before his acquisition, Musk was a vociferous opponent of Twitter’s prior verification process since it favored users like:

  • Politicians
  • Executives
  • Members of the press
  • Organizations

Other social networking sites operated by Meta, like Facebook and Instagram, utilize similar verification mechanisms.

Users who were verified under Twitter’s previous strategy are now regarded as legacy verified accounts that “may not be notable” due to the debut of the new service.

Elon Musk announced Monday that all legacy blue checks would soon be destroyed.

“The way in which they were given out was corrupt and nonsensical,” said Musk.


Twitter Blue relaunches, now costs $11 per month if you subscribe from an iPhone

Elon Musk may be luring Apple into a fight with Republicans

TikTok research finds teens exposed to harmful content

Image source: Psy Post

In 2022, TikTok faced many issues, with security issues coming in the first place.

A recent study raises the possibility that it might negatively affect young users.

After kids create an account on the video-sharing app, it may begin to promote inappropriate material regarding eating disorders and suicide.

The outcomes are expected to fuel the fires as TikTok’s issues worsen, especially in light of how it impacts young users.

The study

The charity Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) released a report on Wednesday.

They discovered that it takes less than three minutes to watch content on TikTok about body image and suicide after signing up.

Users can find a community on the app that promotes information about eating disorders five minutes later.

The researchers claim that they created eight more accounts in the US.

New TikTok users in the US, UK, Canada, and Australia must be at least 13 years old.

The accounts took a little break and liked content about mental health and body image.

Every 39 seconds throughout the course of a 30-minute period, TikTok suggested videos about mental health and body image, according to the CCDH.

TikTok woes

The study is being released as local, state, and federal officials look into potential sanctions for TikTok, particularly concerning privacy and security concerns.

They are also evaluating the app’s safety for teenagers.

The study was made available to the public more than a year after senators questioned executives from social media companies during congressional hearings.

They were worried that the harmful content that would be shared on their platforms would expose younger users, particularly adolescent girls, to their mental health and self-esteem.

Following hearings and disclosures by Facebook leaker Frances Haugen, the companies decided to tighten their control over teenagers.

The CCDH study, however, indicates that more work has to be done.

“The results are every parent’s nightmare,” said Imran Ahmed, the CEO of the CCDH.

“Young people’s feeds are bombarded with harmful, harrowing content that can have a significant cumulative impact on their understanding of the world around them and their physical and mental health.”

Read also: NetChoice claims California law violates First Amendment, sues state


In response to the study’s publication, a TikTok official claimed that it was incorrect for a number of reasons, including:

  • Small sample size
  • The limited 30-minute window for testing
  • How the accounts scrolled past unrelated topics to find other content

“This activity and resulting experience does not reflect genuine behavior or viewing experiences of real people,” said the spokesperson.

“We regularly consult with health experts, remove violations of our policies, and provide access to supportive resources for anyone in need.”

“We’re mindful that triggering content is unique to each individual and remain focused on fostering a safe and comfortable space for everyone, including people who choose to share their recovery journeys or educate others on these important topics.”

The representative claims that the CCDH doesn’t differentiate between positive and negative videos on particular issues, noting that people frequently share inspiring stories of conquering eating disorders.


TikTok asserts that it is constantly enhancing user protections.

For instance, the app now has filters that may exclude explicit or “possibly harmful” videos.

TikTok developed a “maturity score” in July to identify videos with potentially mature or advanced content.

Additionally, users may choose how long they want to spend watching TikTok videos, regularly schedule screen breaks, and access a dashboard that shows information like how often they use the app.

Additionally, TikTok offers a number of parental restrictions.


The US Senator Richard Blumenthal’s office faked a 13-year-old girl’s Instagram account last year.

The account was followed by posts regarding dieting and eating disorders (which are supposed to be banned).

Blumenthal claims that the account began to be elevated to accounts with more extreme diets.

Instagram later deleted the accounts because it had violated its policies against encouraging eating disorders.

Read also: Donald Trump slumps in voter standing based on recent poll

Policy violations

According to TikTok, it is forbidden to post anything that suggests suicide or other self-destructive behavior or that normalizes, normalizes, or glorifies such behavior.

The information below shows videos that were taken down for breaking the laws against self-harm and suicide between April and June 2022:

  • 93.4% were removed at zero views
  • 91.5% were removed 24 hours after being posted
  • 97.1% were removed before anyone reported them

The representative claims that anyone looking for prohibited terms like “#selfharm” won’t come up with anything.

They will be recommended to local aid programs instead.

Despite the assurances, the CCDH argues that additional steps are required to limit some content and enhance protection for individuals under 18.

“This report underscores the urgent need for reform of online space,” said Ahmed.

“Without oversight, TikTok’s opaque platform will continue to profit by serving its users – children as young as 13, remember – increasingly intense and distressing content without checks, resources or support.”


TikTok may push potentially harmful content to teens within minutes, study finds

Apple upgrades iCloud security for user safety

Image source: New York Times

Apple: On Wednesday, the tech giants announced plans to expand end-to-end data encryption to strengthen user data protection.

The extension covers backups, photos, notes, chat history and other services.

However, Apple’s plan will increase tensions with law enforcement agencies around the world.

The expansion

The new security tools add a new feature called Advanced Data Protection.

It allows users to protect specific data from hackers, government, spies and Apple data leaks.

Additionally, the extension will prevent law enforcement from accessing the data.

Apple’s end-to-end encryption ensures that even the platform cannot access the data.

Only the sender and the recipient have access to the data.

Previous clashes

As a result, the tech giant cannot honor requests to disclose data stored in the cloud to investigators.

Apple previously butted heads with law enforcement over attempts to access device data.

An instance came when the FBI tried to break into the iPhone of one of the shooters from the 2015 attack in San Bernardino, California.

Read also: Lensa AI terms and conditions prove to be dangerous


Apple recently made privacy an essential pillar of user pitch through a mix of new tools, including a feature to protect journalists and human rights activists from spyware.

The company has framed the expansion as part of its efforts to combat increasingly complex threats to user data from hackers and a spike in data breaches.

Privacy groups have been urging Apple to increase encryption for iCloud backups for years.

Craig Federighi is the senior vice president of software engineering at Apple.

He spoke to the Wall Street Journal about some of the steps the company took more than a decade ago in designing iCloud and how it encrypts its data needed to build to date.


Apple published a blog post stating that iCloud already protects 14 categories of sensitive data with standard end-to-end encryption.

Categories include Passwords in the iCloud keychain and Data Health.

It also adds nine more categories.

However, due to interoperability issues, the new list doesn’t include encryption for iCloud Mail, Contacts, and Calendar.

Read also: TikTok a security concern according to FBI


Matthew Green, cryptographer and associate professor at the Johns Hopkins Information Security Institute, believes Apple’s move will raise the standard for others to improve encryption.

On Wednesday, he tweeted:

“Why is this a big deal? Because Apple sets the standard on what secure (consumer) cloud backup looks like.”

“Even as an opt-in feature, this move will have repercussions all over the industry as competitors chase them.”

Meanwhile, the FBI released a statement indicating that it is still concerned about the end-to-end thread and user access-only encryption.

“This hinders our ability to protect the American people from criminal acts ranging from cyber-attacks and violence against children to drug trafficking, organized crime and terrorism,” said the FBI.

“End-to-end and user-only-access encryption erodes law enforcement’s ability to combat these threats and administer justice for the American public.”


Apple plans to expand encryption of iCloud data